data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98782/987821ca5c6b7270378d09e31adc8fe316bbb501" alt=""
Holga. Taken from a top floor restaurant at the Tokyo Edo Museum. I held the camera against the glass and took the above photo. The buildings look like a model built for a Gozilla movie.
Digital. Taken at the same time and place as the above picture. Again I pressed the camera against the window. The photo doesn't have the dreamy quality of the Holga picture but the buildings still look like a model city to me. The sky looks more menacing in this picture.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1f54/b1f549a666fba5ab2fcfe2ffbac09c995a628807" alt=""
Holga. A double exposure which has a layered and textured look to it. I took a shots at two difference places to create this effect. A digital camera doesn't take this type of double exposure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80d8b/80d8b1698ab19da81f9c1bc5489a43e9271566c7" alt=""
Digital & Photoshop. This is the second photo from my previous blog. I asked a friend for her comments on the differences between the Holga and digital picutres. Her comments," Here's a few of the differences... I made a new version of your digital one where I changed the contrast and saturation. Its obviously not an exact match - I wasnt really trying for that, but wanted to give visual illustration of what your holga (in its limitations) does to the contrast/color saturation. Also, if you look at the fence on the left hand side of the holga, you can see how the cheap lens bends the image (in a pleasing way). and the focus is a little softer in the holga (again, more pleasing/arty)."
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar